"sm70- why not Duesenberg?" (sm70-whynotduesenberg)
11/20/2014 at 18:45 • Filed to: wpeo | 2 | 8 |
Aya, Almost Has A Cosmo With Toyota Engine Owned by a BMW.
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
11/20/2014 at 18:53 | 1 |
Dammit autofocus!
Forgetful
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
11/20/2014 at 19:04 | 1 |
I was trying to buy one before I got my FR-S. Still want.
djmt1
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
11/20/2014 at 19:07 | 2 |
Losing the 5 means it is 10 seconds faster around the ring.
itranthelasttimeiparkedit
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
11/20/2014 at 19:17 | 1 |
I saw 3 today, I want...
mattc993
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
11/20/2014 at 19:53 | 1 |
It's so weird that in the last few months (for me anyway), the Bangle M5 has gone from "worst design ever" to "HNNGGGGG".
Other people have said the same, maybe not with that particular timeframe, but this was widely regarded as a very polarizing design until recently. To say that it's aged well would be an incredible understatement.
sm70- why not Duesenberg?
> mattc993
11/20/2014 at 20:06 | 1 |
It's an incredibly handsome vehicle IMO. Much better than the F10.
E92M3
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
11/20/2014 at 21:41 | 1 |
They still look great today. The 7 series of the same era looks REALLY dated though.
Denver Is Stuck In The 90s
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
11/21/2014 at 00:27 | 1 |
This is a horrible photo of an M5 but an amazing photo of your dashboard. Your camera really does focus on all the wrong things doesnt it?